Development methodologies: Difference between revisions
From ym2149.org
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
** actually perfect is not the enemy of good | ** actually perfect is not the enemy of good | ||
** ignore concerns due to them not being raised in an obsequious enough way | ** ignore concerns due to them not being raised in an obsequious enough way | ||
* Wishful thinking-driven development - this | * Wishful thinking-driven development - this code i've thrown at the screen will stick, or not idc | ||
== Tech guardrails == | == Tech guardrails == |
Revision as of 11:11, 19 April 2024
- Sweep it under the carpet-driven development - never investigate any root cause, just throw code at the screen until the problem appears to go away
- Plate spinning-driven development - we don’t have time to write automated tests, instead n developers must perform an increasing amount of incomplete manual testing forever
- Fear-driven development - tests would expose bugs so don't write any, a cool new lib would break things as we don't have enough tests so ban that, a cool new lib would confuse our developers because we treat them as a liability instead of investing in people, deployment to prod would expose bugs so let's not do that, and so on
- Pearl clutching-driven development - any hint of creativity must be extinguished
- Gotcha-driven development - instead of publishing guidance to empower teams to avoid problems, send the results of scans straight to the top of their backlog without context
- Emoji-driven development - replace logging critical to investigating incidents with pretty logging, or no logging at all
- kim jong un-driven development - so much critical info only exists in the engineering manager’s head you have to frantically jot it down when they’re speaking, and don't dare log off until they've stopped
- Playing the security card - get a team to drop everything to fix a nebulous security issue, never explain the impact of leaving things as they are
- Aspect-oriented programming - an admission that the code is unmaintainable, and commitment to keeping it that way
- Reddit-driven development - how dare you question the hive mind's golden opinion
- must not show weakness by being wrong in public
- actually perfect is not the enemy of good
- ignore concerns due to them not being raised in an obsequious enough way
- Wishful thinking-driven development - this code i've thrown at the screen will stick, or not idc
Tech guardrails
- normalise treating developers as a liability